Marx Communications, B2B Public Relations
 

Why We Can’t Kill the Press Release Just Yet

There is a great discussion going on on Mark Evans’ blog about the social media release.

Whaddya say?

Yes, despite all its touting by PR professionals, the social media release has never quite taken off. And, if PR professionals can’t sell something, I smell a rat.

So first some basics.

The social media release came to fame in 2006 when Todd Defren of Shift Communications introduced it. It was – and is – a multi media release
The idea was to give busy reporters everything they need in a release including photos, video, social media.

Yet it isn’t widely used. While Evans’ surmises that press releases in general aren’t necessary, I am going to refine that a bit and say that social media releases aren’t necessary. As some commentators on Evans’ post noted, the good, old fashioned press release can easily be tweaked to include video, social media and other elements of the social media release. In a sense the social media release has been coopted, its social and multi-media features absorbed into the regular press release. Business Wire, for example, lets you send multimedia releases and propagate them on social media.

There is another reason I would argue that it hasn’t caught on. In my opinion, it’s well —  how do I put this delicately?  –  it’s not too exciting to read. It’s bad enough to have jargon-filled releases as too many are – and I’m sure I’ve done some of my own. But who wants to read a glorified outline? Here see if you don’t agree.

The fact is that in the urgency to be helpful and offer up all the icing on the cake, the social media release misses what’s useful about a well-written release – and why I think it’s lasted so many years. Done right it tells a story – the who, what, when, where, how. Now don’t get me wrong. I’m not suggesting the old gray lady of a release is a work of art. But it can quickly get to the point and in some cases gets you to pay attention.

Just for fun, I went on Business Wire’s site and looked under the contest category. This release, Calling All Swedish Hospital Babies and Parents, caught my eye and I bet it would yours. What a great title! The release is engagingly written with all the key facts. Now I would have loved to see a visual added to the release but the release does its job by itself.

So where does this leave everyone?

As David Meerhman Scott pointed out in his groundbreaking book, The New Rules of Marketing & PR, now in its second edition, releases today are not just for the media but for the search engines and ultimately customers. That means:

  • Press releases need to be readable and enticing and search-engine friendly so they get highly indexed by Google and its ilk.
  • Press releases need to make it easy for journalists. All the facts tied together in a way that a media person could simply rewrite a sentence or two along with his/her byline if the media person or blogger were short of time.
  • Press releases should not be puff pieces. Just the facts.
  • Press releases need to be jargon-free

For other ways to improve your press release, check out this great post: 
http://www.badlanguage.net/62-ways-to-improve-your-press-releases

So what type of press release, if any, do you use? I’d love to hear from you.

5 Responses to “Why We Can’t Kill the Press Release Just Yet”

  1. Rob Shepherd Says:

    I do have a lot of sympathy for this article.

    I’ve always taken it that the phrase ‘social media release’ was really little more than a gimmick. What sensibly crafted, professionally displayed online press release does NOT have the capability of full sound and vision these days? But do they make it any more ‘social’?

    My company, Press Dispensary, added multimedia to our releases several years before Todd’s phrase rang out, but we saw that as evolution, not a mutation that required a new name.

    And I don’t quite get the use of the word ‘social’ in this context. Do photos and videos make a release more social, or is it just good content – in whatever medium – that socialises a release? A highly interesting or side-splittingly funny paragraph is naturally social, with or without other media.

    The reason why I’m piping up here is that I have just a wee bit of concern about the phrase ‘social media’ when applied to releases: I have a suspicion that some members of the profession assume that somehow a ‘social media’ release is a tool specifically for ‘the social media’ (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn et al) while a text-only release isn’t. And although it’s true that photos in a release can also be displayed on (say) Flickr, and videos might also be displayed on YouTube, thereby increasing the number of channels to market, I’m not convinced they mean that a multimedia release is social while a text-only release isn’t.

    Don’t get me wrong: I advocate additional media for our clients. I like those extra channels, and I also like the fact that we provide journalists, picture editors and bloggers with high-res, print ready images to make their lives easier and more fruitful. And I’ll use the phrase ‘social media release’ if I think that’s what my clients understand best. But I’m not convinced it’s right … and, more importantly, I’m concerned that it’s possibly becoming the Emperor’s new clothes in our business sector.

    Rob Shepherd
    Press Dispensary

  2. Wendy Marx Says:

    Rob, thank you for your very thoughtful comments. Interesting point you make about whether a “social media release” as currently defined is more “social” than a text release. I agree with your point that good content in whatever medium is what socializes a release. Thanks for your thoughts.

  3. Tea Party Says:

    Greetings, good post.

  4. Olin Eisenzimmer Says:

    Finally a article / post that has answered my questions. Thanks friend.

  5. Wendy Marx Says:

    Thanks, Olin. Glad to here you found the post useful.

Leave a Reply